Enfoques sobre el patrimonio arqueológico y su impacto en el sistema legal de los países sudamericanos
No Thumbnail Available
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Abstract
Description
Un análisis de la legislación aplicable al patrimonio arqueológico de los países sudamericanos permite reconocer características comunes e identificar la alternancia de ciertas miradas y enfoques que han marcado tendencia en diferentes períodos de tiempo. En orden cronológico, es posible distinguir tres Modelos de Protección del Patrimonio Arqueológico, denominados Tradicional, Transicional y Tendencial, los cuales han tenido predominancia en los sistemas legales de los países sudamericanos. El objetivo de este trabajo consiste en caracterizar esos modelos y ejemplificarlos con las normas legales de los principales países de la región, para luego discutir las tendencias actuales en vista al futuro próximo. Se tomarán en consideración algunas disposiciones legales de Argentina, Brasil, Bolivia, Colombia, Chile, Ecuador, Paraguay, Perú, Uruguay y Venezuela. Para realizar esta investigación, se efectúo un análisis de las fuentes legales disponibles en repositorios digitales y de bibliografía especializada. Como resultado, se destaca la supervivencia actual del Modelo Tradicional con agregados temáticos propios de los modelos posteriores, así como la creciente complejidad que la problemática indígena trae a la gestión ?cuando no a la propiedad misma? del patrimonio arqueológico, al tiempo que la participación comunitaria sigue siendo un objetivo a alcanzar.
An analysis of the legislation applied to the archaeological heritage in South American countries allows to recognize common characteristics and identify the alternation of certain views and approaches that have marked a trend in different periods of time. In chronological order, it is possible to distinguish three Models of Archaeological Heritage Protection, named Traditional, Transitional and Tendential, which have been predominant in the legal systems of the South American countries. The objective of this paper is to characterize these models and exemplify them with the legal regulations of the main countries in the region, and then discuss current trends and future prospects. Some legal provisions of Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Chile, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela will be taken in consideration. In order to carry out this research, an analysis of the legal sources available in digital repositories and specialized bibliography was carried out. As a result of this study, the current survival of the Traditional Model with thematic additions typical of later models stands out, as well as the increasing complexity that indigenous issue bring to the management –if not to the property itself– of the archaeological heritage, while community participation is still a goal to be achieved.
Fil: Endere, Maria Luz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Investigaciones Arqueológicas y Paleontológicas del Cuaternario Pampeano. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Investigaciones Arqueológicas y Paleontológicas del Cuaternario Pampeano; Argentina
An analysis of the legislation applied to the archaeological heritage in South American countries allows to recognize common characteristics and identify the alternation of certain views and approaches that have marked a trend in different periods of time. In chronological order, it is possible to distinguish three Models of Archaeological Heritage Protection, named Traditional, Transitional and Tendential, which have been predominant in the legal systems of the South American countries. The objective of this paper is to characterize these models and exemplify them with the legal regulations of the main countries in the region, and then discuss current trends and future prospects. Some legal provisions of Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Chile, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela will be taken in consideration. In order to carry out this research, an analysis of the legal sources available in digital repositories and specialized bibliography was carried out. As a result of this study, the current survival of the Traditional Model with thematic additions typical of later models stands out, as well as the increasing complexity that indigenous issue bring to the management –if not to the property itself– of the archaeological heritage, while community participation is still a goal to be achieved.
Fil: Endere, Maria Luz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Investigaciones Arqueológicas y Paleontológicas del Cuaternario Pampeano. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Investigaciones Arqueológicas y Paleontológicas del Cuaternario Pampeano; Argentina
Keywords
PATRIMONIO ARQUEOLÓGICO, LEGISLACIÓN, GESTIÓN, PARTICIPACIÓN, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6