Show simple item record

A field of experiences, biased impacts and assumptions

Un campo de experiencias, afectaciones y suposiciones;
Um campo de experiências, afetações e “achismos”

dc.creatorMendes de Miranda, Ana Paula
dc.creatorMuniz, Jacqueline
dc.date2021-03-20
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-15T00:09:33Z
dc.date.available2022-04-15T00:09:33Z
dc.identifierhttp://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/runa/article/view/8708
dc.identifier10.34096/runa.v42i1.8708
dc.identifier.urihttp://suquia.ffyh.unc.edu.ar/handle/suquia/19064
dc.descriptionThis paper presents reflections about researches on the field of public security, violences and activisms in Brazil, from experiences developed by the authors, considering the constitutive dilemmas of this thematic. It emphasizes the importance of empirical researches based on an anthropological construction and of the challenges of the interlocution with Law. Furthermore, the reflexive theoretic and methodological approach on State and public policies must also orient the analysis of activisms, to avoid homogenization and generalization of the juridical and political classifications which dominate the field. Based on this perspective, a case study is presented, demonstrating the importance of multidimensionality and situationality on studies about (in)security. It is a methodology developed for analysis on risk perceptions, constructed to identify social situations of violence which affected the regular work of measurement of electricity, on the cities of São Gonçalo and Duque de Caxias (Rio de Janeiro State), in order to prevent theft.en-US
dc.descriptionThis paper presents reflections about researches on the field of public security, violences and activisms in Brazil, from experiences developed by the authors, considering the constitutive dilemmas of this thematic. It emphasizes the importance of empirical researches based on an anthropological construction and of the challenges of the interlocution with Law. Furthermore, the reflexive theoretic and methodological approach on State and public policies must also orient the analysis of activisms, to avoid homogenization and generalization of the juridical and political classifications which dominate the field. Based on this perspective, a case study is presented, demonstrating the importance of multidimensionality and situationality on studies about (in)security. It is a methodology developed for analysis on risk perceptions, constructed to identify social situations of violence which affected the regular work of measurement of electricity, on the cities of São Gonçalo and Duque de Caxias (Rio de Janeiro State), in order to prevent theft.es-ES
dc.descriptionO artigo apresenta reflexões sobre pesquisas no campo da segurança pública, violências e ativismos no Brasil, a partir de experiências desenvolvidas pelas autoras, levando em consideração os dilemas de constituição desse campo temático. Salienta-se a importância das pesquisas empíricas, num recorte antropológico e os desafios de interlocução com o Direito. Discute ainda que a abordagem teórico-metodológica reflexiva sobre o Estado e as políticas públicas deve orientar também as análises sobre os ativismos, para evitar a homogeneização e generalização das classificações jurídico-políticas que dominam o campo. Com base nessa perspectiva apresenta-se um estudo de caso demonstrando a importância da multidimensionalidade e a situacionalidade em estudos sobre (in)segurança. Trata-se da metodologia desenvolvida para análise de percepções de risco, construída para identificar as situações sociais de violência que afetavam o trabalho regular de medição de energia elétrica, nos municípios de São Gonçalo e Duque de Caxias (Rio de Janeiro), para prevenção do furto.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/html
dc.languagepor
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherInstituto de Ciencias Antropológicas, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UBAes-ES
dc.relationhttp://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/runa/article/view/8708/8785
dc.relationhttp://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/runa/article/view/8708/8967
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2021 Ana Paula Mendes de Miranda, Jacqueline Munizes-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceRUNA, archivo para las ciencias del hombre; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 (2021): Cuestiones, dilemas y desafíos metodológicos en investigaciones sobre seguridad pública, violencia(s) y activismos; 21-41es-ES
dc.sourceRUNA, archivo para las ciencias del hombre; Vol 42 No 1 (2021): Cuestiones, dilemas y desafíos metodológicos en investigaciones sobre seguridad pública, violencia(s) y activismos; 21-41en-US
dc.sourceRUNA, archivo para las ciencias del hombre; v. 42 n. 1 (2021): Cuestiones, dilemas y desafíos metodológicos en investigaciones sobre seguridad pública, violencia(s) y activismos; 21-41pt-BR
dc.source1851-9628
dc.source0325-1217
dc.subjectempirical researches; multidimensionality; situationality; public policies; public securityen-US
dc.subjectinvestigaciones empíricas; multidimensionalidad; situacionalidad; políticas públicas; seguridad públicaes-ES
dc.subjectpesquisas empíricas; multidimensionalidade; situacionalidade; políticas públicas; segurança públicapt-BR
dc.titleA field of experiences, biased impacts and assumptionsen-US
dc.titleUn campo de experiencias, afectaciones y suposicioneses-ES
dc.titleUm campo de experiências, afetações e “achismos”pt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeArtículos Invitados para el Dossieres-ES


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record